Krista Tippett mentions an oath taken by med students entering the university of Minnesota program. Particularly touching is a part that says "We will cure sometimes, treat often, and comfort always."
https://onbeing.org/blog/an-oath-for-new-physicians/
So what then is the distinction between an oath or promise, and the inherent Responsibility in becoming a physician and healer? Both seem to incorporate agreement between/among parties, but an oath is one sided. Mutual promises between lovers could be broken by either one alone.
Responsibility and Rights are general principles that cannot in concept be separated nor abrogated. Individuals can choose to not follow such principles, but that does not alter the fundamental validity of the Right and the Responsibility which are bound together.
https://onbeing.org/blog/an-oath-for-new-physicians/
So what then is the distinction between an oath or promise, and the inherent Responsibility in becoming a physician and healer? Both seem to incorporate agreement between/among parties, but an oath is one sided. Mutual promises between lovers could be broken by either one alone.
Responsibility and Rights are general principles that cannot in concept be separated nor abrogated. Individuals can choose to not follow such principles, but that does not alter the fundamental validity of the Right and the Responsibility which are bound together.
Comments
Post a Comment